.




Hugh Segal and "Extremism"

by Glenn Woiceshyn

Published in the Financial Post on Nov/29/1997.



Re: "For U.S. Extremists, No Issues More Crucial Than Their Own"--by Hugh Segal --Nov/22-24/97--The Financial Post

Hugh Segal did it again! He deployed an intellectually bankrupt term -- "extremism" -- to package together religious fanatics and power-lusters with principled defenders of reason and individual rights in order to use the former to smear the latter. (Last time, Nov. 8-10, he used "intolerance.") On this occasion he packages together U.S. anti-abortionist politicians with anyone who opposes statist/socialistic institutions like the United Nations.

The anti-abortionists want to deprive a woman of her fundamental right to her own body in the name of a mystical doctrine accepted on faith. The United Nations has, to name just a few black marks, helped legitimize murderous communist nations such as China and the former USSR by granting them veto power, bolstered collectivist/statist trends such as tribalism and environmentalism, and hampered U.S. efforts in properly dealing with murderous dictators like Saddam Hussein.

There is a life-and-death difference between the consistently (extremely!) rational and the consistently irrational, or between the principled defender of liberty and its consistent violator, or between Thomas Jefferson and Adolph Hitler (or Maximilien Robespierre!). Left-leaning "moderates" like Segal want to obliterate this distinction with the "extremist" charge, resurrect an unprincipled, middle-of-the-road philosophy as the ideal, and thereby sedate people into "tolerating" the toxicity of the Left.

Sincerely,

Glenn Woiceshyn







© 1997 Glenn Woiceshyn. All rights reserved. This article can be found on-line at at http://www.capitalism.org/glennw.


Home


. .
Design: Integrate Interactive